北京工商大学学报
(
社会科学版
)摇 摇 摇 摇 2015
年
摇
第
4
期
益平
,
何帆
,
张永生
.
中国对外直接投资研究
.
北京
:
北京
大学出版社
,
2013
:
3 - 16.
[
11
]
Cheung Y W
,
Qian X. Empirics of China蒺s out鄄
ward direct investment
[
J
]
. Pacific Economic Review
,
2009
,
14
(
3
):
312 - 341.
[
12
]
何本芳
,
张祥
.
我国企业对外直接投资区位选
择模型探索
[
J
]
.
财贸经济
,
2009
(
2
):
96 - 101.
[
13
]
蒋冠宏
,
蒋殿春
.
中国对外投资的区位选择
:
基
于投资引力模型的面板数据检验
[
J
]
.
世界经济
,
2012
(
9
):
21 - 40.
[
14
]
谢孟军
,
郭艳茹
.
法律制度质量对中国对外直
接投资区位选择影响研究
———
基于投资动机视角的面板
数据实证检验
[
J
]
.
国际经贸探索
,
2013
(
6
):
107 - 118.
[
15
]
宗芳宇
,
路江涌
,
武常岐
.
双边投资协定
、
制度
环境和企业对外直接投资区位选择
[
J
]
.
经济研究
,
2012
(
5
):
71 - 82.
[
16
]
阎大颖
.
中国企业对外直接投资的区位选择及
其决定因素
[
J
]
.
国际贸易问题
,
2013
(
7
):
128 - 135.
[
17
]
余官胜
,
李会粉
.
横向
、
纵向抑或两者兼具
———
中国企业对外直接投资动机实证研究
[
J
]
.
财贸研究
,
2013
(
5
):
79 - 85.
[
18
]
余官胜
,
林俐
.
我国企业对外直接投资投向哪
国
(
地
)
集群
? ———
基于浙江省样本的计数模型实证研究
[
J
]
.
中南财经政法大学学报
,
2014
(
5
):
125 - 132.
[
19
]
Atras P
,
Helpmen E. Global sourcing
[
J
]
. Journal
of Political Economy
,
2004
,
112
(
6
):
1375 - 1418.
The Internal Factors Influencing Private Enterprises蒺 Decision
Concerning Foreign Direct Investment
———
An Empirical Study
Based on Micro鄄level Enterprise Data of Wenzhou
YU Guansheng
(
Business school of Wenzhou University
,
Wenzhou
,
Zhejiang 325035
,
China
)
Abstract
: In this paper, we have focused on the internal factors influencing private enterprises蒺 decision concerning foreign
direct investment. Through comparing the information about private enterprises蒺 foreign direct investment from Wenzhou Com鄄
merce Bureau and Wenzhou private enterprises蒺 micro鄄level data from “China Industrial Enterprises Database冶, we have found
that there exists great internal difference between private enterprises which have launched direct foreign investment and the private
enterprises which have not. Furthermore, through the empirical research using the constructed binary choice model for empirical
research, we have found that the firm size and export tendency are common positive factors influencing private enterprises蒺 direct
foreign investment to the developed and developing countries. Productivity and technology capability are also positive factors influ鄄
encing private enterprises蒺 direct foreign investment to developing countries, while the internal management efficiency is a nega鄄
tive factor. This difference is due to the different motives between private enterprises蒺 direct foreign investment to developed coun鄄
tries and developing countries.
Key Words
: private enterprise; direct foreign investment; firm size; export tendency; binary choice model
(
本文责编
摇
邓
摇
艳
)
·84·
