北京工商大学学报
(
社会科学版
)摇 摇 摇 摇 2015
年
摇
第
3
期
中的财政分权
[
J
]
.
经济研究
,
2008
(
7
):
78 - 89.
[
11
]
于长革
.
财政分权
、
政府间竞争与经济社会发
展失衡
[
J
]
.
地方财政研究
,
2010
(
8
):
4 - 8.
[
12
]
孙开
.
论政府间转移支付中的因素法问题
[
J
]
.
财政研究
,
1996
(
3
):
37 - 40
,
50.
[
13
]
马骏
.
中央向地方的财政转移支付
———
一个均
等化公式和模拟结果
[
J
]
.
经济研究
,
1997
(
3
):
11 - 20.
[
14
]
钟晓敏
.
论政府间财政转移支付制度
:
一个可
供选择的模式
[
J
]
.
经济研究
,
1997
(
9
):
44 - 49.
[
15
]
谷成
.
基于财政均等化的政府间转移支付制度
设计
[
J
]
.
财贸经济
,
2010
(
6
):
40 - 45.
[
16
]
伏润民
,
常斌
,
缪小林
.
我国地区间公共事业
发展成本差异评价研究
[
J
]
.
经济研究
,
2010
(
4
):
81 -92.
[
17
]
吕炜
,
王伟同
.
发展失衡
、
公共服务与政府责
任
———
基于政府偏好和政府效率视角的分析
[
J
]
.
中国社
会科学
,
2008
(
4
):
52 - 64.
[
18
]
刘尚希
,
杨元杰
,
张洵
.
基本公共服务均等化
与公共财政制度
[
J
]
.
经济研究参考
,
2008
(
4
):
2 - 9.
[
19
]
卢洪友
,
卢盛峰
,
陈思霞
.
“
中国式财政分权
冶
促进了基本公共服务发展吗
? [
J
]
.
财贸研究
,
2012
(
6
):
1 - 7.
[
20
]
朱玲
.
西藏农牧区基层公共服务供给与减少贫
困
[
J
]
.
管理世界
,
2004
(
4
):
41 - 50.
[
21
]
常修泽
.
逐步实现基本公共服务均等化
[
N
]
.
人民日报
,
2007 鄄鄄01 鄄鄄31
:
9.
[
22
]
孙开
.
财政转移支付手段整合与分配方式优化
研究
[
J
]
.
财贸经济
,
2009
(
7
):
45 - 49.
[
23
]
王雍君
.
中国的财政均等化与转移支付体制改
革
[
J
]
.
中央财经大学学报
,
2006
(
9
):
1 - 5.
[
24
]
Savas E S. On equity in providing public services
[
J
]
. Management Science
,
1978
,
24
(
8
):
800 - 808.
[
25
]
世界银行
. 2006
世界发展报告
:
公平与发展
[
M
]
.
北京
:
清华大学出版社
,
2006
(
3
):
6 - 7
[
26
]
李敏纳
,
覃成林
,
李润田
.
中国社会性公共服务
区域差异分析
[
J
]
.
经济地理
,
2009
(
6
):
887 - 893.
[
27
]
徐莉莉
.
我国基本公共服务支出省际差异的测
定与评价
[
J
]
.
统计观察
,
2012
(
4
):
107 - 108.
[
28
]
任强
.
中国省级公共服务水平差异的变化
:
运用
基尼系数的测度方法
[
J
]
.
中央财经大学学报
,
2009
(
11
):
5 - 9.
[
29
]
肖育才
,
谢芳
.
民族地区财政转移支付效应评价
[
J
]
.
中南财经财法大学学报
,
2013
(
1
):
71 - 76.
Quantitative Research on Fiscal Transfer Payment in
Equalization of Interregional Basic Public Services
WU Qiang & LIU Jing
(
School of Economics
,
Beijing Technology and Business University
,
Beijing 100048
,
China
)
Abstract
: Based on China蒺s 31 provincial鄄level administrative regions as samples, this paper selects 5 public services with
10 indicators under 4 categories, using factor analysis and principal component analysis (PCA), to calculate the difference coef鄄
ficient in the cost of basic public services and dynamically measure the transfer payment amount required by each region. Through
the calculation, it reflects that the eastern region is mainly dominated by the economic level in the demand for public services,
the western region is mainly dominated by inter鄄district services, and the central regionis mainly dominated by population, scien鄄
tific education and health. There arerelatively high regional differences infinancial resources and costs. The empirical study shows
that 5 developed provincesare far more than the equalization of basic public services required,1 developed province is less than
the equalization required, most of the western provinces and specific central provinces are under equal demand for a long time.
The suggestions are put forward: tomake the legislation to determine the scope of basic public services and its proportion in gov鄄
ernment spending, to make a comprehensive measure on the abilities of local fiscal revenues and degree of efforts, to establishthe
geographic information system of fiscal and taxation to dynamically reflect the change in differences, and to adjust the directionand
strength of transfer paymentstimely to narrow the gap in interregional basic public services.
Key Words
: public service equalization; interregional differences;inter鄄government transfer payments; quantitative research
(
本文责编
摇
王
摇
轶
)
·49·
