Page 42 - 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》
P. 42

第 35 卷摇 第 5 期                   谢志华: 预算管理体制的本质与变革

   可以分为集权与分权的模式;但从历史的演变过                               [4]路军伟,陈希晖. 法国政府预算与政府会计改革:
   程以及本质属性来看,预算管理体制所要解决的                           评介与借鉴[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2009(3):78 - 81.
   根本问题不是简单的集权或分权的问题,而是要                               [5]徐培娥. 法国地方财政税收管理制度[J]. 欧洲
   明确划分各预算相关主体的事权边界,实现事权                           研究, 1997(3):84 - 86.
                                                       [6]朱国斌. 集权或分权:法国的选择与地方分权改
   与事责相匹配;在此基础上,根据各预算相关主体
                                                   革(上)[J]. 中国行政管理, 1994(4):46 - 48.
   的事权和事责确定相应的预算收支权力与责任。
                                                       [7]马蔡琛,赵笛,苗珊. 共和国预算 70 年的探索与
   也就是说,预算管理体制的核心问题是建立在事
                                                   演进[J]. 财政研究,2019(7):3 - 12.
   权或者事责的基础上的预算权力与预算责任的匹                               [8]张通. 新中国财政 60 年的变迁与思考[J]. 财政
   配问题。 只有实现了预算权力与责任的匹配,预                          研究, 2009(11):2 - 9.
   算管理体制才能够更加有效地运转。                                    [9]财政部财政科学研究所课题组, 贾康, 赵全厚.
                                                   中国财政改革 30 年的路径与脉络[J]. 经济研究参考,
       参考文献:                                       2009(2):5 - 11.
       [1]谢志华. 论国家预算的国家治理效应[J]. 北京                     [10] 谢志华, 杨涵博, 粟立钟. 企业预算的本质
   工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2017(5):1 - 10.                  [J]. 财务研究, 2016 (2):3 - 10.
       [2]胡熙华. 英国地方政府治理的变迁及启示[J]. 产                    [11]刘昆. 在全国财政工作会议上的讲话( 节选)

   业与科技论坛, 2008(5):249 - 251.                      [J]. 中国财政,2019(2):4 - 16.
       [3] 古益强. 法国财政体制的运行特点及其启示                        [12]李天舒. 如何把握和划分政府与市场边界[J].
   [J]. 财政研究,2001(2):76 - 77.                      人民论坛,2014(34):46 - 48.



             Essence and Transformation of Budget Management System



                                            XIE Zhihua
                 (Business School/ Center for Collaborative Innovation of State鄄owned Assets Management,
                        Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)


       Abstract: Modern nations are budgetary nations. Budget nations must have national budget. National budget must have
   budget management. The choice of budget management system determines the efficiency of national budget management, which
   determines the management level of modern nations. Historically speaking, the budget management system has been divided into
   centralization model and decentralization model. The centralization model is adopted mainly in unitary nations and the decentrali鄄
   zation model mainly in federal nations. However, the centralization model in unitary nations has also experienced the gradual
   changes to the decentralization model while the decentralization model in federal nations has gradually shifted to centralized direc鄄
   tion, too. As a result of such evolvement, the budget management system does not lie in the form of centralization or decentraliza鄄
   tion, but in a clear division of powers in the related subjects of respective budgets. On the basis of clear division of powers, the
   corresponding power and responsibility of budgetary revenue and expenditure should be equipped to realize the accrual match.
   That is to say, the accrual match or matching power and responsibility in budget management system is its essential attribute.
   Based on this nature, it is necessary to determine the powers or responsibilities in the related subjects of respective budgets in a
   more scientific and reasonable way, which can be the basis to form the power and responsibility of budgetary revenue and expend鄄
   iture.
       Key Words: national budget; budget management system; centralization model; decentralization model; accrual match;
   power of budgetary revenue and expenditure

                                                                          (本文责编摇 王沈南)



                                                                                        · 3 7 ·
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47