Page 121 - 《北京工商大学学报（社会科学版）》

北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)摇 摇 摇 摇 2020 年摇 第 5 期

cial Economics, 2006, 82(3): 591 - 629. [16]毕青苗, 陈希路, 徐现祥,等. 行政审批改革与
[12]KAPLAN D S, PIEDRA E, SEIRA E. Entry regu鄄 企业进入[J]. 经济研究, 2018(2): 140 - 155.
lation and business start鄄ups: evidence from Mexico [ J]. [17]黄亮雄, 孙湘湘, 王贤彬. 商事制度改革有效
Journal of Public Economics, 2011, 95 (11 / 12): 1501 - 激发创业了吗? ———来自地级市的证据[J]. 财经研究,
1515. 2020(2): 142 - 155.
[13]BRUHN M. License to sell: the effect of business [18]明秀南, 黄玖立, 冼国明. 进入管制、创新与生
registration reform on entrepreneurial activity in Mexico [J]. 产率[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2018(1): 1 - 21.
Policy Research, 2011, 93(1): 382 - 386. [19]王永进, 冯笑. 行政审批制度改革与企业创新
[14]BRANSTETTER L, LIMA F, TAYLOR L J, et al. [J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(2): 24 - 42.
Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? [20]田鸣, 张阳, 唐震. 典型国家创新创业发展模式

Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal [ J]. Economic 研究及启示[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2016(4): 5 -18.
Journal, 2014, 124(577): 805 - 832. [21] 陈刚. 管制与创业———来自中国的微观证据
[15]张龙鹏, 蒋为, 周立群. 行政审批对创业的影 [J]. 管理世界, 2015(5): 89 - 99.
响研究———基于企业家才能的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, [22]吴一平, 王健. 制度环境、政治网络与创业:来
2016(4): 57 - 74. 自转型国家的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015(8): 45 - 57.

Research on Influence of Entry Regulation Intensity on

Entrepreneurial Quality Based on Analysis of Cross鄄country Data

ZHOU Qingjie & ZHANG Zhifang
(School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract: The entry regulation intensity is an important factor to impact the entrepreneurial activities. Scientific entry regu鄄
lation reform is conducive to optimizing government function and improving the ease of doing business. In this article, administra鄄
tive approval time and cost are used as proxy variables of entry regulation intensity, and entrepreneurship incidence rate and inno鄄
vative entrepreneurship rate are used as proxy variables of entrepreneurship quality. This article uses the relevant survey data of
the World Bank and the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor during the years from 2009 to 2018 to study the impact of entry regula鄄
tion intensity on entrepreneurial quality and the heterogeneity among countries with different income levels. The study finds that
entry regulation intensity has a significantly negative effect on entrepreneurial quality. Reducing the cost of administrative approv鄄
al can increase significantly the entrepreneurship incidence rate, and shortening time of administrative approval can increase sig鄄
nificantly the innovative entrepreneurship rate. These curbing effects vary among countries with different income levels. In the
high鄄income countries, the time of administrative approval for starting a business has a significantly negative impact on both entre鄄
preneurship incidence rate and innovative entrepreneurship rate. But in the middle鄄income countries, the administrative approval
cost has a significantly negative impact on entrepreneurship incidence rate. The research conclusion indicates that the government
should relax the entry regulation further, attach great importance to the long鄄term characteristics of entry regulation reform, design
the specific reform contents according to the types of entrepreneurship in different regions, and promote the overall improvement
in the quality of entrepreneurship.
Key Words: entry regulation; entrepreneurship quality; commercial system reform; entrepreneurship incidence rate; inno鄄
vative entrepreneurship rate; business environment

(本文责编摇 王沈南)

· 1 1 6 ·