Page 96 - 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第4期
P. 96
第 35 卷摇 第 4 期 摇 摇 摇 摇 潘凌云, 董摇 竹: 控股股东持股比例如何影响企业生产率
[18] 孙兆斌. 股权集中、股权制衡与上市公司的技 管理, 2017(1):84 - 95.
术效率[J]. 管理世界, 2006(7):115 - 124. [25] GROSSMAN S J, HART O. Takeover bids, the
[19] 王化成, 曹丰, 叶康涛. 监督还是掏空:大股东持 free鄄rider problem, and the theory of the corporation[J]. The
股比例与股价崩盘风险[J]. 管理世界, 2015(2):45 -57. Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, 11(1): 42 - 64.
[ 20 ] ASHBAUGHSKAIFE H, COLLINS D W, [26] GIANNETTI M, LIAO G, YU X. The brain gain
LAFOND R, et al. The effects of corporate governance on of corporate boards: evidence from China[J]. The Journal of
firms蒺 credit ratings[J]. Journal of Accounting and Econom鄄 Finance, 2015, 70(4):1629 - 1682.
ics, 2006, 42(1): 203 - 243. [27] GUL F A, KIM J B, QIU A. Ownership concen鄄
[21] SHLEIFER A, VISHNY R W. Large shareholders tration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price
and corporate control [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, synchronicity: evidence from China[J]. Journal of Financial
1986, 94(3): 461 - 488. Economics, 2010, 95(3):425 - 442.
[22] GORTON G, SCHMID F. Corporate governance, [28] HEALY P M, PALEPU K G. Information asym鄄
ownership dispersion and efficiency: empirical evidence from metry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a re鄄
Austrian cooperative banking [ J]. Journal of Corporate Fi鄄 view of the empirical disclosure literature[J]. Journal of Ac鄄
nance, 1999, 5(2):119 - 140. counting and Economics, 2001, 31(1 / 3):405 - 440.
[23] MARGARITIS D, PSILLAKI M. Capital struc鄄 [29] GROSSMAN S J, HART O. An analysis of the
ture, equity ownership and firm performance[J]. Journal of principal鄄agent problem[J]. Econometrica, 1983, 51 (1):
Banking and Finance, 2010, 34(3): 621 - 632. 7 - 45.
[24] 赵康生, 周萍, 蔺楠. 大股东持股与公司诉讼 [30] 方芳,蔡卫星. 银行业竞争与企业成长:来自工
风险———基于中国上市公司的实证分析[J]. 外国经济与 业企业的经验证据[J]. 管理世界,2016(7):63 - 75.
How Shareholding Ratio of Controlling Shareholder
Affect Firm Productivity
PAN Lingyun & DONG Zhu
(Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China)
Abstract: The continuous improvement of firm productivity can help enterprises to obtain excess profits in the fierce market
competition, thereby creating higher value for shareholders. Based on the data of China蒺s listed companies during the years from
2007 to 2018, the effect of controlling shareholder蒺s shareholding ratio on firm productivity was studied. The research results show
that the increase in the shareholding ratio of the controlling shareholder promotes the improvement of firm productivity. Further re鄄
search on the mechanism of action has found that among companies with fewer analysts tracking, lower product market competi鄄
tion, and audits conducted by small firms, the controlling shareholder蒺s shareholding ratio has a more significant role in promoting
firm productivity, indicating that the controlling shareholder蒺s shareholding can promote firm productivity through the monitoring
effect. Regulatory departments should be fully aware of the important role played by the shareholding structure in the process of
firm productivity, and further strengthen the protection for investors. Also, the listed companies should pay more attention to im鄄
proving the level of governance, continuously optimizing the equity structure and improving firm productivity.
Key Words: firm productivity; controlling shareholder; monitoring effect; analyst tracking; product market competition;
scale of accounting firm
(本文责编摇 潘端莲)
· 9 1 ·