Page 102 - 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期
P. 102

第 35 卷摇 第 3 期摇  摇 李鹤尊, 张晶晶, 段文譞: 战略规划流程、绩效指标因果联系与预算目标承诺:一项调查研究

       [7]CHONG V K, CHONG K M. Budget goal commit鄄    [19]FRENCH J R P, RAVEN B. The bases of social
   ment and informational effects of budget participation on per鄄  power[ C] 椅 CARTWRIGHT D. Studies in Social Power.
   formance: a structural equation modeling approach [J]. Be鄄  Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press,1959: 150 -
   havioral Research in Accounting, 2002, 14(1): 65 - 86.  167.
       [8]WENTZEL K. The influence of fairness perceptions  [20]BARNARD C I. The functions of the executive
   and goal commitment on managers蒺 performance in a budget  [M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1968.
   setting [J]. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2002, 14  [21]ARANDA C, ARELLANO J. Strategic perform鄄
   (1): 247 - 271.                                 ance measurement systems and managers蒺 understanding of
       [9]MAIGA A S, JACOBS F A. Budget participation蒺s  the strategy: a field research in a financial institution [J].
   influence on budget slack: the role of fairness perceptions,  Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 2010, 6

   trust and goal commitment[J]. Journal of Applied Manage鄄  (3): 330 - 358.
   ment Accounting Research, 2007, 5(1): 39 - 58.      [22]ITTNER C D, LARCKER D F. Are nonfinancial
       [10]崔学刚, 谢志华, 刘辉. 预算功能彰显及其绩                 measures leading indicators of financial performance? An a鄄
   效研究———基于我国企业预算管理调查问卷的实证检验                       nalysis of customer satisfaction [ J]. Journal of Accounting
   [J]. 中国会计评论, 2011(2): 173 - 190.                Research, 1998, 36(1): 1 - 35.
       [11]于增彪, 袁光华, 刘桂英, 等. 关于集团公司预                   [23]HOLLENBECK J R, KLEIN H J, O蒺LEARY A M,
   算管理系统的框架研究[J]. 会计研究, 2004(3): 3 -               et al. Investigation of the construct validity of a self鄄report
   29.                                             measure of goal commitment [ J]. Journal of Applied Psy鄄
       [12]NEELY A, GREGORY M, PLATTS K. Perform鄄  chology, 1989, 74(6): 951 - 956.
   ance measurement system design: a literature review and re鄄  [24]MAHONEY T A, JERDEE T H, CARROLL S J.
   search agenda [J]. International Journal of Operations and  The job ( s) of management [ J]. Industrial Relations: A
   Production Management, 1995, 15(4): 80 - 116.   Journal of Economy and Society, 1965, 4(2): 97 - 110.
       [13]BOURGUIGNON A, MALLERET V, NORRE鄄           [25]CHIN W W. The partial least squares approach to
   KLIT H. The American balanced scorecard versus the French  structural equation modeling [J]. Modern Methods for Busi鄄
   tableau de bord: the ideological dimension [J]. Management  ness Research, 1998, 295(2): 295 - 336.
   Accounting Research, 2004, 15(2): 107 - 134.        [26]FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating struc鄄
       [14]HUMPHREYS K A, GARY M S, TROTMAN K      tural equation models with unobservable variables and meas鄄
   T. Dynamic decision making using the balanced scorecard  urement error [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18
   framework [J]. Accounting Review, 2016, 91(5): 1441 -  (1): 39 - 50.
   1465.                                               [27]SHIELDS J F, SHIELDS M D. Antecedents of
       [15]LANGLEY A. The roles of formal strategic plan鄄  participative budgeting [J]. Accounting, Organizations and
   ning [J]. Long Range Planning,1988,21(3): 40 - 50.  Society, 1998, 23(1): 49 - 76.
       [16]VIL魥 J, CANALES J I. Can strategic planning  [28]刘凌冰, 贾凡凡, 韩向东. 预算参与能改善预
   make strategy more relevant and build commitment over time?  算管理的效果吗? ———基于中国企业实地调查的经验证
   The case of RACC [ J]. Long Range Planning, 2008, 41  据[J]. 中国会计评论, 2018 (1): 73 - 106.
   (3): 273 - 290.                                     [29]MILANI K. The relationship of participation in
       [17]LOCKE E A, SHAW K N, SAARI L M, et al.  budget鄄setting to industrial supervisor performance and atti鄄
   Goal setting and task performance: 1969—1980 [ J]. Psy鄄  tudes: a field study [J]. Accounting Review, 1975, 16(2):
   chological Bulletin, 1981, 90(1): 125 - 152.    274 - 284.
       [18]LOCKE E A, LATHAM G P. New directions in    [30]孙健, 王百强, 袁蓉丽. 信息系统整合、预算程
   goal鄄setting theory [ J]. Current Directions in Psychological  序公平与企业业绩———一项基于国有企业的调查研究
   Science, 2006, 15(5): 265 - 268.                [J]. 管理世界,2017(5): 131 - 143.








                                                                                        · 9 7 ·
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107