Page 102 - 《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期
P. 102
第 35 卷摇 第 3 期摇 摇 李鹤尊, 张晶晶, 段文譞: 战略规划流程、绩效指标因果联系与预算目标承诺:一项调查研究
[7]CHONG V K, CHONG K M. Budget goal commit鄄 [19]FRENCH J R P, RAVEN B. The bases of social
ment and informational effects of budget participation on per鄄 power[ C] 椅 CARTWRIGHT D. Studies in Social Power.
formance: a structural equation modeling approach [J]. Be鄄 Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press,1959: 150 -
havioral Research in Accounting, 2002, 14(1): 65 - 86. 167.
[8]WENTZEL K. The influence of fairness perceptions [20]BARNARD C I. The functions of the executive
and goal commitment on managers蒺 performance in a budget [M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1968.
setting [J]. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2002, 14 [21]ARANDA C, ARELLANO J. Strategic perform鄄
(1): 247 - 271. ance measurement systems and managers蒺 understanding of
[9]MAIGA A S, JACOBS F A. Budget participation蒺s the strategy: a field research in a financial institution [J].
influence on budget slack: the role of fairness perceptions, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 2010, 6
trust and goal commitment[J]. Journal of Applied Manage鄄 (3): 330 - 358.
ment Accounting Research, 2007, 5(1): 39 - 58. [22]ITTNER C D, LARCKER D F. Are nonfinancial
[10]崔学刚, 谢志华, 刘辉. 预算功能彰显及其绩 measures leading indicators of financial performance? An a鄄
效研究———基于我国企业预算管理调查问卷的实证检验 nalysis of customer satisfaction [ J]. Journal of Accounting
[J]. 中国会计评论, 2011(2): 173 - 190. Research, 1998, 36(1): 1 - 35.
[11]于增彪, 袁光华, 刘桂英, 等. 关于集团公司预 [23]HOLLENBECK J R, KLEIN H J, O蒺LEARY A M,
算管理系统的框架研究[J]. 会计研究, 2004(3): 3 - et al. Investigation of the construct validity of a self鄄report
29. measure of goal commitment [ J]. Journal of Applied Psy鄄
[12]NEELY A, GREGORY M, PLATTS K. Perform鄄 chology, 1989, 74(6): 951 - 956.
ance measurement system design: a literature review and re鄄 [24]MAHONEY T A, JERDEE T H, CARROLL S J.
search agenda [J]. International Journal of Operations and The job ( s) of management [ J]. Industrial Relations: A
Production Management, 1995, 15(4): 80 - 116. Journal of Economy and Society, 1965, 4(2): 97 - 110.
[13]BOURGUIGNON A, MALLERET V, NORRE鄄 [25]CHIN W W. The partial least squares approach to
KLIT H. The American balanced scorecard versus the French structural equation modeling [J]. Modern Methods for Busi鄄
tableau de bord: the ideological dimension [J]. Management ness Research, 1998, 295(2): 295 - 336.
Accounting Research, 2004, 15(2): 107 - 134. [26]FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating struc鄄
[14]HUMPHREYS K A, GARY M S, TROTMAN K tural equation models with unobservable variables and meas鄄
T. Dynamic decision making using the balanced scorecard urement error [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18
framework [J]. Accounting Review, 2016, 91(5): 1441 - (1): 39 - 50.
1465. [27]SHIELDS J F, SHIELDS M D. Antecedents of
[15]LANGLEY A. The roles of formal strategic plan鄄 participative budgeting [J]. Accounting, Organizations and
ning [J]. Long Range Planning,1988,21(3): 40 - 50. Society, 1998, 23(1): 49 - 76.
[16]VIL魥 J, CANALES J I. Can strategic planning [28]刘凌冰, 贾凡凡, 韩向东. 预算参与能改善预
make strategy more relevant and build commitment over time? 算管理的效果吗? ———基于中国企业实地调查的经验证
The case of RACC [ J]. Long Range Planning, 2008, 41 据[J]. 中国会计评论, 2018 (1): 73 - 106.
(3): 273 - 290. [29]MILANI K. The relationship of participation in
[17]LOCKE E A, SHAW K N, SAARI L M, et al. budget鄄setting to industrial supervisor performance and atti鄄
Goal setting and task performance: 1969—1980 [ J]. Psy鄄 tudes: a field study [J]. Accounting Review, 1975, 16(2):
chological Bulletin, 1981, 90(1): 125 - 152. 274 - 284.
[18]LOCKE E A, LATHAM G P. New directions in [30]孙健, 王百强, 袁蓉丽. 信息系统整合、预算程
goal鄄setting theory [ J]. Current Directions in Psychological 序公平与企业业绩———一项基于国有企业的调查研究
Science, 2006, 15(5): 265 - 268. [J]. 管理世界,2017(5): 131 - 143.
· 9 7 ·