Page 47 - 北京工商大学学报社会科学版2018年第6期

北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)摇 摇 摇 摇 2018 年摇 第 6 期

pers. ssrn. com/ sol3 / papers. cfm? abstract_id = 1329554. (2) : 135 - 146.
[8] NGUYEN H C, NORDMAN C J, ROUBAUD F. [17] 张延吉,秦波. 城镇正规就业与非正规就业的
Who suffers the penalty? A panel data analysis of earnings 收入差异研究 [J] . 人口学刊,2015 (4): 92 - 103.
gaps in Vietnam [J]. Journal of Development Studies, 2013, [18] 王庆芳,郭金兴. 非正规就业者的境况得到改
49 (12) : 1694 - 1710. 善了么? ———来自 1997—2011 年 CHNS 数据的证据[J].
[9] MALONEY W F. Does informality imply segmenta鄄 人口与经济, 2017 (2): 116 - 126.
tion in urban labor markets? Evidence from sectoral transi鄄 [19] 黄志岭. 人力资本、收入差距与农民工自我雇
tions in Mexico [ J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 佣行为 [J]. 农业经济问题, 2014 (6): 39 - 45.
1999,13(2) : 275 - 302. [20] 叶静怡,王琼. 农民工的自雇佣选择及其收入
[10] MALONEY W F. Informality revisited [J]. World [J]. 财经研究, 2013 (1): 93 - 102.
Development, 2004, 32(7) : 1159 - 1178. [21] 宁光杰. 自我雇佣还是成为工资获得者? 中国
[11] ASTEBRO T B, CHEN J. The entrepreneurial 农村外出劳动力的就业选择和收入差异[J]. 管理世界,
earnings puzzle: mismeasurement or real? [ J]. Journal of 2012 (7): 54 - 66.
Business Venturing, 2014, 29(1) : 88 - 105. [22] 黄志岭. 城乡户籍自我雇佣差异及原因分析
[12] 惠新华. 金融发展与收入不平等关系检验——— [J]. 世界经济文汇, 2012 (6): 111 - 119.
基于美国宏观时间序列数据[J]. 河北经贸大学学报, [23] 黄志岭. 教育、自我雇佣收入及其城乡差异
2017(4):41 - 50. [J]. 农业经济问题, 2013 (6): 89 - 94.
[13] JOVANOVIC B. Selection and the evolution of in鄄 [24] 曹永福,杨梦婕,宋月萍. 农民工自我雇佣与收
dustry [J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(3) : 649 - 670. 入:基于倾向得分的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2013
[14] MACDONALD G M. The economics of rising stars (10): 30 - 41.
[J]. The American Economic Review, 1988, 78(1) : 155 -166. [25] 张抗私,刘翠花,丁述磊. 正规就业与非正规就
[15] ROSEN S. The economics of superstars [J]. The 业工资差异研究[J]. 中国人口科学, 2018 (1):83 - 94.
American Economic Review, 1981, 71(5) : 845 - 858. [26] ROSENBAUM P R, RUBIN D B. The central role
[16] ROY A D. Some thoughts on the distribution of of the propensity score in observational studies for causal
earnings [J]. Oxford Economic Papers鄄new Series, 1951, 3 effects [J]. Biometrika, 1983, 70(1):41 - 55.

Income Effect, Development Characteristics and Group
Disparity of Self鄄employment in China

ZHANG Li
(School of Economics and Business Administration, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract: Self鄄employment has both functions in increasing employment and raising income. Applying Propensity Score
Matching method with CHIP2002 and CHIP2013 data, this paper estimates the income effect of self鄄employment in China. The
research finds that: (1) self鄄employed workers generally earn a wage premium; (2) the earning premium for self鄄employment is
obviously higher in 2013 than in 2002; (3) self鄄employed workers with urban hukou earn a higher premium than those with rural
hukou, not only in absolute amount but also in increase range; (4) as to successful self鄄employment, employers earn a much
higher premium than non鄄employers; (5) the education level and the amount of start鄄up capital are key to successful self鄄employ鄄
ment. Accordingly, various measures are taken to help laborers who are willing to start business and realize self鄄employment, es鄄
pecially increasing the training of human capital and the fund support in start鄄up capital to help them develop into successful self鄄
employment. These are both beneficial to improve the income of Chinese laborers and to realize the policy goal of improving em鄄
ployment quality in China.
Key Words: self鄄employment; income effect; Propensity Score Matching method; disparity between urban and rural hukou;
employment quality
(本文责编摇 王摇 轶)

· 4 2 ·