Page 131 - 《北京工商大学学报（社会科学版）》

北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)摇 摇 摇 摇 2020 年摇 第 5 期

么? [N]. 法制日报,2019鄄鄄08鄄鄄15(03). [17]肖永平,谢新胜. ODR:解决电子商务争议的新
[8]王梦遥. 最高法:互联网法院审案应全程在线 模式[J]. 中国法学,2003(6):145 - 156.
[N]. 新京报,2018鄄鄄09鄄鄄08(A05). [18]LUCILLE M P, THOMAS D C. Cyberjustice: on鄄
[9]丁德昌. “无为而治冶与中国古代民间纠纷解决范式 line dispute resolution (ODR) for e鄄commerce[M]. Upper
[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2009(2):22 -28. Saddle River: Prentice Hall,2004.
[10]范愉. 非诉讼程序(ADR) 教程[M]. 北京:中国 [19]郑世保. ODR 裁决书强制执行机制研究[J]. 法
人民大学出版社,2002. 学评论,2014(3):161 - 169.
[11]张文显. 司法的实践理性[M]. 北京:法律出版 [20]最高人民法院关于进一步推进案件繁简分流优
社,2016. 化司法资源配置的若干意见[N]. 人民法院报,2016鄄鄄 09鄄鄄
[12]曾宪义. 关于中国传统调解制度的若干问题研 14(04).
究[J]. 中国法学,2009(4):34 - 46. [21]徐汉明,张新平. 网络社会治理的法治模式[J].
[13]谢东慧. 纠纷解决与机制选择:民国时期民事纠 中国社会科学,2018(2):48 - 71.
纷解决机制[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2013. [22]蒋建国. 网络协同治理与网络文化的协调发展
[14]史长青. 裁判、和解与法律文化传统———ADR 对 [J]. 理论学刊,2018(4):145 - 151.
司法职能的冲击[J]. 法律科学( 西北政法大学学报), [23]郑世保. 在线纠纷解决机制的困境和对策[J].
2014(2):3 - 12. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2013(6):190 - 197.
[15] 费 孝 通. 乡 土 中 国 [ M]. 北 京: 人 民 出 版 社, [24]艾尼. 数字正义:当纠纷解决遇见互联网科技
2015. [M]. 赵蕾,赵精武,曹建峰,译. 北京:法律出版社,2019.
[16] 王海萍. 多元化纠纷解决机制的实践与展望 [25]陈健,蔡超静,王梦华,等. ODR 理论视域下在线
[N]. 人民法院报,2016鄄鄄09鄄鄄21(05). 仲裁模式研究[J]. 北京仲裁,2019(2):70 - 86.

Application and Improvement of Non鄄judicial ODR in China:
Taking Xianyu Court as an Example

HAN Xuanyao
(Law School, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130012, China)

Abstract: With the rapid growth of Internet economic disputes, it is urgent for China to strengthen and improve the online
dispute resolution (ODR) to solve the conflicts of rights in cyberspace. The non鄄judicial ODR not only inherits the thought of
China蒺s Confucian tradition in non鄄litigation dispute resolution, but also integrates the cutting鄄edge Internet information technolo鄄
gy, fully combining tradition and modernity and creatively creating a new mode of litigation source governance with the attribute of
“online resolution for online dispute冶. Taking Xianyu Court as an example, based on the analysis from the perspective of three鄄
dimensional benefit theory of individuals, organizations and society, it is found that non鄄judicial ODR can realize private relief
with diversified forms, information exchange and weak antagonism by integrating the concept of non鄄litigation dispute resolution.
Non鄄judicial ODR can alleviate the litigation pressure, reduce the litigation delay, and optimize the judicial resource allocation by
advocating pre鄄litigation diversion mechanism. The non鄄judicial ODR realizes the construction of non鄄litigation welfare of the
whole society by playing the role of determining and resolving disputes. In order to promote the non鄄govermental, autonomous and
efficient non鄄judicial ODR which should become the first line of defense to resolve the network鄄related disputes, it is suggested
that the country should make legislation to confirm the legitimate status of ODR, establish the mechanism of cohesion with judicial
ODR, standardize the professional ethics of dispute鄄resolving personnel, perfect the privacy protection mechanism of netizen蒺s da鄄
ta, and establish the judicial confirmation system of non鄄judicial ODR.
Key Words: online dispute resolution (ODR); non鄄judicial ODR; Internet governance; platform autonomy; Internet de鄄
mocracy; Xianyu Court
(本文责编摇 王摇 轶)

· 1 2 6 ·