刘桂春1,2,叶陈刚1,邹亚生1.审计质量、产权性质与内部控制——基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J].北京工商大学社科版,2013,28(5):70-76 |
审计质量、产权性质与内部控制——基于中国上市公司的经验证据 |
Audit Quality, Property Right and Internal Control:Empirical Evidence Based on Chinese Listed Companies |
投稿时间:2013-04-10 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 审计质量 产权性质 内部控制 自选择 处理效应模型 |
英文关键词:audit quality property right internal control self selection treatment effect model |
基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目“国家治理、国家审计制度与预防惩治腐败体系创新研究”(13AZD002);国家社会科学基金重点项目“我国资本市场系统稳定性评估和监测研究”(11AZD010);国家社会科学基金项目“企业内部控制综合评价模型与中国上市公司内部控制质量研究”(12BGL032)。 |
|
摘要点击次数: 763 |
全文下载次数: 900 |
中文摘要: |
对审计质量、产权性质与内部控制的关系进行了研究。结果表明,行业专著程度高的事务所审计与内部控制水平有显著的正相关关系;总体上国有企业比非国有企业的内部控制水平高,但在规模相同的条件下,非国有企业内部控制水平反而更高;与非国有企业相比,经过行业专著程度高的事务所审计的国有企业内部控制水平更高。另外,高质量审计与企业内部控制水平存在自选择问题,在运用处理效应模型控制了自选择偏差后,研究结论依然成立。 |
英文摘要: |
This paper studies the relationship among audit quality, property right and internal control. The research finds that the audit quality of Big 4 and those audit firms with their specialization in an industry has significantly positive correlation with internal control quality. Internal control quality is generally better in the state-controlled listed companies than in the non-state-controlled ones, however, after scale control, i.e. under the condition of the same scale, internal control quality is better in the non-state-controlled listed companies than in the state-controlled ones. The state-controlled listed companies audited by audit firms with specialization in an industry have a better internal control as opposed to the non-state-controlled listed companies. Besides, there is a problem of self selection between high quality auditing and internal control quality. Using the treatment effect model to control the deviation of self selection, the research conclusion is still robust. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |