粟立钟1,3,谢志华2.现金股利、代理风险及市场反应[J].北京工商大学社科版,2013,28(2):65-73
现金股利、代理风险及市场反应
Cash Dividend, Agency Risk and Market Reaction: A Study on A-share Non-state-owned Companies
投稿时间:2013-01-05  
DOI:
中文关键词:  现金股利  代理风险  制度要素  资源要素
英文关键词:cash dividends  agency risk  institution elements  resource elements
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目(11BGL022);北京市社会科学基金项目(11JGB027);北京市教育委员会科研基地—科技创新平台—会计与投资者保护研究基地项目(PXM2012_014213_000031)。
作者单位
粟立钟1,3,谢志华2 1.中央财经大学 会计学院, 北京100081
2.北京工商大学, 北京100048
3.新疆财经大学 会计学院, 新疆 乌鲁木齐830012 
摘要点击次数: 640
全文下载次数: 656
中文摘要:
      以2008—2011期间A股市场非国有企业为研究对象,借鉴了系统论的思维模式构建分析框架,研究了不同代理风险情况下,现金股利预案公告非预期市场反应的差异。实证分析结果表明:最终控制人的掏空能力越强、受到的掏空激励越大、面临的掏空机会越好,现金股利预案公告的非预期市场反应越大;而相关的监督机制越完善,现金股利预案公告的非预期市场反应越小。最后,在深化对股利代理成本相关问题认识的同时,也为A股市场“分红新政”提供了经验参考。
英文摘要:
      With the A-share non-state-owned listed companies during the years from 2008 to 2011 as research samples, based on the thinking model of Systematic Theory to construct the analytical framework, this study is made on the difference between cash dividend plan announcement and unexpected market reaction in the circumstances of different agency risks. The empirical results show that the stronger the tunneling ability of final controller, the more the incentive to tunneling, the better the tunneling opportunity, the bigger the unexpected market reaction to cash dividend plan announcement. However, the more perfect the supervision mechanism, the smaller the unexpected market reaction to cash dividend plan announcement. This paper gives a deepening understanding on dividend agency cost and provides a good reference for “New Policy on Dividends” of A-share market.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭